Hong Kong: Where North Korea goes to launder money?

wAAACH5BAEAAAIALAAAAAAQAAkAAAIKlIpy0Po5yUFQA7

But camouflaged in the normalcy is a business that seemingly exists in name only.

At least, Unaforte is supposed to be there. That is the address listed on its publicly available corporate filings provided to the Hong Kong government. When CNN visited the office, it found neither Unaforte nor its listed company secretary, Prolive Consultants Limited.

Instead, room 2103 was home to a seemingly unrelated company: Cheerful Best Company Services. Only one man was there when CNN stopped by, and he said a representative for Prolive Consultants only comes by every so often to pick up mail. He had not heard of Unaforte.

The Easey Commercial Building in Hong Kong.
The United Nations Panel of Experts on North Korea — the body charged with monitoring sanctions enforcement on the hermit nation — said in two recent reports that Unaforte opened and owned a bank in the North Korean city of Rason. That is likely a violation of the latest UN Security Council resolution banning joint international ventures with North Korea, according to Christopher Wall, a lawyer who specializes in international trade law and a partner at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman in Washington, DC.

Unaforte is not unique. It’s just one of a handful of front companies identified by the United Nations, nongovernmental analysts and US law enforcement that help North Korea access the global financial system.

Front companies — also known as shell companies — are legitimate corporations that do not possess significant assets or maintain active business operations. Some serve licit business purposes — helping foreign companies establish a foothold in overseas markets, for one, or reap foreign tax benefits. Others help to conceal the true ownership of a business or the parties involved in illicit transactions.

Here’s an example: say business A wants to sell business B something potentially unlawful, like military-grade hardware. If investigators were already monitoring business A, business B could pay a front company for the weapons instead of business A. Or business B could create its own front company to pay business A’s front company, making the network even bigger and more nebulous.

North Korea is believed to use these types of practices to cover up much of its trade, from selling coal and fuel to exporting weapons.

“The (North Korean) regime accesses the international financial system through front companies and other deceptive financial practices in order to buy goods and services abroad,” Sigal Mandelker, the undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence at the US Department of the Treasury, said in Senate testimony on September 28.

Hong Kong is one of two business jurisdictions (along with the British Virgin Islands) where the UN Panel of Experts on North Korea has seen the largest share of North Korean-controlled front companies operating, said Hugh Griffiths, the panel’s coordinator.

“You can just count them up in our reports — Hong Kong is the preponderance,” Griffiths told CNN.

The city is no stranger to those looking to make a quick buck by skirting the law, whether it was the pirates who roamed the South China Sea in the 16th century or the Triads who spread their tentacles following Chinese Civil War, while the city was still under British control.

Today, Hong Kong is governed as a special administrative region of China. When the British handed control of the city to Beijing in 1997, the agreement was to run Hong Kong according to a policy known as “one country, two systems.” It promised Hong Kongers their own political system — with more individual liberties, market freedoms and lax corporate oversight and reporting requirements — would in large part continue as is, but Hong Kong would become part of China.

“It should come as no surprise that Hong Kong is featured so prominently in our report,” Griffiths said. “It’s the closest major international financial center to North Korea. It’s the closest major offshore international financial center to North Korea. And historically, it’s been a center of global and regional trade … and with fewer questions asked and looser regulation than, say, Beijing.”

CNN reached out to both Hong Kong police and its Joint Financial Intelligence Unit for comment on the United Nations reports, Unaforte and shell companies in Hong Kong altogether and was told “police do not comment on individual case(s).”

A secretary and a director

When Unaforte’s company particulars show up in Hong Kong’s publicly available corporate records, the name of just one individual appears. He holds a passport from the small Caribbean island of Dominica. A passport number is there, but not a phone number.

Those details shed light on Hong Kong’s incorporation requirements. To start a company in Hong Kong, one needs at least one director (has to be an actual person) and a company secretary (which can either be a person or another company, but must be based in Hong Kong), according to the Companies Registry website.
Though the company’s registered office must be in Hong Kong, they are allowed to share an office with their company secretary and neither technically has to operate out of that address, an official with the Hong Kong Companies Registry told CNN on the phone. But doing that is considered a “red flag” for money laundering investigators.

“These practices, while legal, lend themselves to North Korean efforts to camouflage the real identity and nationality of those who stand behind these registered entities,” said Griffiths.

C4ADS, a Washington-based nonprofit firm which conducts data-driven analysis of security issues, identified 160 North Korean front companies in Hong Kong in a 2016 report. And Sayari Analytics, another firm that uses open data to monitor the connections between firms, has identified more than 100 entities in Hong Kong linked to sanctioned North Korean ones.

The system wasn’t designed for wrongdoing; rather, it makes Hong Kong an easy place for companies abroad do business, as they do not have to incur the cost of setting up a new shop, according to David Webb, a former investment banker who is now a Hong Kong-based activist investor.

“It’s common and it’s not a sign of wrongdoing itself,” Webb said.

To service offshore clients, there are plenty of secretarial services that provide company directors abroad with assistance. They often serve as company secretaries for their clients.

Prolive Consultants, the company secretary for Unaforte, appears to be one such company.

“As a company that offers secretarial services, we do not interfere with our clients’ business. What we do is just to help collect clients’ business registration certificates and forms, assist them,” said Amy Lam with Prolive Consultants, whose phone number CNN obtained after visiting the Easey Building office.

When asked by CNN what type of business Unaforte is engaged in, Lam said: “We do not interfere with what kind of business our client does. Whether they are successful or not, or whether their business is profitable or not, we don’t know.”

Ledgers and credits

The Port of Hong Kong.

The sale of about $6 million worth of refined sugar in 2009 helped bring another company doing business with Pyongyang to the attention of American authorities.

North Korea was ostensibly doing something simple: buying a food staple. But they did it through a complicated, labyrinthine transaction involving North Korea, Dandong Hongxiang Industrial Development (DHID), a bank and a Canadian company, according to a 2016 criminal complaint.

That’s because if companies like DHID or Unaforte are doing business in dollars, it means their transactions are likely to go through the United States at some point (unless they’re conducted in cash).

Companies that are sanctioned in most cases cannot easily conduct transactions in the dollar, as US banks have to back those deals and would filter and flag sanctioned entities, Anthony Ruggiero, an expert in the use of targeted financial measures at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, told CNN.

The DHID charges revealed that to get around US prying eyes, North Korea uses a complex ledger and credit scheme to hide North Korea’s involvement in dollar transactions, Ruggiero explained to Congress in September.

Thirteen of DHID’s front companies were located in Hong Kong. Eleven shared the same registered address in Wan Chai, less than a kilometer away from the Easey Commercial Building, the indictment said.

CNN was not able to reach DHID for comment.

“North Korea’s fundamental problem is it needs to operate at least partly in dollars or euros but has to figure out ways to do it when none of its partners want to be the node where North Korea and the US overlap in the international financial system,” said Sheena Greitens, a professor at the University of Missouri who has been studying North Korea’s illicit finance activities for the last 10 to 15 years. “Because of the (international) financial architecture and the importance of the dollar, the US has a tremendous ability to sort of say who can use the dollar system and who can’t.”

DHID does not appear to be alone. In addition to the more than 100 firms and individuals in Hong Kong linked to North Korea, another 300-plus mainland Chinese entities are also connected to the same North Korean networks, according to Jessica Knight, the director of analysis at Sayari.

“Companies in Hong Kong and mainland China are often closely connected — sharing owners or directors, for example — and operate as part of a single broader North Korean facilitation network,” said Knight.

“Chinese businessmen like to conduct their illicit business in Hong Kong for the same reasons they like to conduct their licit business there: it is so much easier. Since North Korean facilitation networks are largely based in China and run by Chinese citizens, it is no surprise that those same networks frequently run through Hong Kong,” she said.

Hong Kong’s appeal may stem from a service it offers front companies that potentially gets around US oversight when using the dollar: the Clearing House Automated Transfer System (CHATS) for certain transactions involving US dollars for payments between banks.
Though CHATS is used for legitimate purposes in most cases, it is outside the purview of US federal law enforcement, says David Asher, one of the architects of the 2006 sanctions on Banco Delta Asia, which identified and froze $25 million worth of North Korean funds abroad.

“If they were clearing those transactions through New York (banks), we’d zap them because they’re sanctioned. We’d freeze them, we’d forfeit the money,” said Asher. “If it goes through CHATS, it’s a black hole.”

That, according to Asher, has helped Hong Kong become a gateway for North Korea, a place where North Korean front companies can turn the foreign currencies they earn from selling formerly licit exports like coal or textiles (now banned by UN sanctions), or the illicit ones like weapons and drugs, into US dollars.

North Korea’s 2015 exports

Source: Observatory of Economic Complexity

“This stuff is hiding in plain sight. It’s been made known to the public authorities and they’ve done nothing,” he said.

Peaceful pressure

The intersection of Pedder Street and Des Voeux Road in Hong Kong’s Central district is seen at night.

All of this is important to the United States because controlling North Korea’s cash flow is key to its strategy to rein in Pyongyang.

US President Donald Trump’s administration calls it a “peaceful pressure” campaign — ramp up sanctions and diplomatic isolation on North Korea in the hopes that it will put its nuclear weapons on the negotiating table.

The approach appears to be moving ahead, with a bevy of UN sanctions and unilateral US sanctions being passed in September, including an executive order that penalizes any company or person doing business with North Korea by either cutting off their access to the US financial system or freezing their assets — or potentially both.

Washington now has the authority to punish countries and companies doing business with North Korea by basically cutting them off from the US economy, according to Wall, the Washington-based international trade lawyer.

The next step, he says, will be proving it.

“There is going to have to be some action taken on this executive order to show that we really mean what we say in terms of cutting off business with North Korea,” Wall said. “If we don’t do that, then this will just be a paper tiger. It won’t really be effective.”

Kinnie Li contributed to this report. Stephen George and Emma Lacey-Bordeaux edited. Timelapses from Getty Images.



Source by [author_name]

Related posts